A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design performs at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such regions are subject matter to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, specifically in a sensitive coastal atmosphere which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partially created, is in the correct placement. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their view, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal preparing disputes, the place views of The ocean are equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has considering that develop into emblematic of the depth of the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were intended to Collect visual evidence from the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Situations described, describing how the two Males entered the water in the course of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this sort of actions were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a region affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail via the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as readers sought to know the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment in the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea René Collier and Paul Feely degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded via waistline-higher drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.