A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a household home in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration Rene Collier and Paul Feely of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when basic concerns like environmental security and residence rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre with the dispute stands partially crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. Regardless of whether it'll in the long run be altered, eliminated, or done as planned will rely upon the court’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely keep on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most intently watched arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent years.