A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their relatives household. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted underneath setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by creating a wall over and above the boundaries in their site, leading to an encroachment over a Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, therefore spots are topic to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological effects, particularly inside of a delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the proper position. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has considering that develop into emblematic on the depth in the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they ended up meant to Obtain Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times noted, describing how the two Adult males entered the water in the course of serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the location became Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just trying to make a family property in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal Rene Collier land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct Experienced backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme technique.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with one another extended after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case lengthen past that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.